Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- work:exercise2 [2022/12/22 21:52] – 83.60.73.74
+++ work:exercise2 [2022/12/22 21:55] (current) – 83.60.73.74
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ==== Discussion ====
-The first results on the exercise can be read at the following online report.
+The first results on the exercise can be read at the following
+[[http://festelar3.ugr.es:3838/ugr-apps/plato-reports/ex2/ex2rep.html|online report]].
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 ==== Conclusions ====
-(tbd)
+The numerical convergence of the frequencies shown by GYRE and ADIPLS is robust and reliable. GraCo results are not representative (we will discuss them in detail when IS are delivered). The variations in the frequencies computed by these codes are around 0.005 μHz in the worst case, and around 0.002μHz around
+n= 20.
+P04 seems good for the frequency computations, although P06 is the optimum case (in terms of frequency differences). It worth study the impact of choosing P06 instead of P4 on the computation time.
+As expected, model 2-002 gives slightly better global behaviour in the statistics.
+The choice of eulerian/lagrangian variable has no significant impact on the results.